Arts & Culture

  • Print

A People Person

Camille Pissarro, Cocotte, Reading, oil on canvas, 1899. The exhibition "Pissarro's People" will be on display at the Clark Art Institute through October 2. Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty.

Camille Pissarro, Cocotte, Reading, oil on canvas, 1899. The exhibition “Pissarro’s People” will be on display at the Clark Art Institute through October 2. Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty.

Most art lovers have heard of Camille Pissarro. But when asked to name their favorite Pissarro painting, they picture ... an empty canvas. “Pissarro’s People,” an exhibition at the Clark Institute in Williamstown, Massachusetts, seeks to fill that canvas.

In his own time, Pissarro was eminent. He was one half of the famous Salon des Refusés in 1863 (along with Cézanne): painters rejected by the academic Paris Salon. He was the only painter shown in all eight Impressionist exhibitions. In fact, some believe Pissarro to be the inventor of Impressionism. Cézanne called him “humble and colossal.”

One problem is that there are a dozen Pissarros: Pissarro the Impressionist, Pissarro the neo-Impressionist, Pissarro the pointillist, etc. A distinctive style like Renoir’s is memorable, even if it’s nauseating. Pissarro was ceaselessly restless, searching for a newer art.

Born in 1830 to Jewish parents in St. Thomas, then part of the Danish West Indies, Pissarro attended a Moravian school along with Afro-Caribbean students, until he was 12. Then he was sent to boarding school in France. When his schooling ended, Pissarro’s father wished him to enter his business, but Pissarro rebelled. At the age of 22, he took off to Venezuela, to work as an artist. By the age of 25, he was living in Paris; soon, he was studying with Corot and Courbet. In 1871, Pissarro married his mother’s maid, Julie Vellay, with whom he would eventually have seven children.

Pissarro was a lifetime anarchist, and his art reflect his beliefs. Often he painted agricultural tasks. “He believed in the nobility of manual labor, such as farming, and indeed he saw his own work as a painter as being no more elevated than that of the farmer. He used images of workers—often workers in the field, but other types as well—to illustrate his belief that labor could be harmonious with a life of health and leisure,” observes Kathleen Morris, director of exhibitions at the Clark.

Have something to say?

Login or register to leave a comment.